1. The defendant is based on the completion of the acquisition by prescription on December 31, 1965 with respect to the real estate stated in the attached list to the plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The elderly farmland improvement association was merged into the Korea Agricultural and Rural Infrastructure Corporation on January 1, 200, and thereafter the name of the Korea Agricultural and Rural Community Corporation was changed to the Korea Agricultural and Rural Community Corporation, and the Korea Agricultural and Rural Community Corporation to the plaintiff.

B. On June 7, 194, an old-gun started to construct a reservoir for the purpose of supplying agricultural water to the land located in the Jeju-gun B of the old-gun on December 31, 194, and occupied and managed it. On May 198, Article 18 of the Farmland Improvement Cooperatives Act and Article 6 of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act of the same Act, the old-gun transferred the rights and duties to the above C reservoir to the old Farmland Improvement Association, which is the Plaintiff’s telegraph. The elderly Farmland Improvement Association acquired the above facilities and comprehensively took over the rights and duties arising from the above facilities and the land, and thereafter the Plaintiff occupied and managed the C reservoir up to the present date.

C. Around November 16, 2000, the Defendant acquired the ownership and completed the registration of ownership transfer under Article 5358 on June 8, 2010, by acquiring the ownership due to the inheritance due to a consultation division conducted on November 16, 200.

On April 25, 1922, G acquired ownership on April 25, 1922, and on January 14, 1957, E died on November 16, 200 after Australia inheritance, the Defendant acquired ownership and completed the registration of transfer of ownership on June 8, 2010 by the receipt of the elderly Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Office of Daegu District Court No. 5357 on June 8, 2010.

(hereinafter referred to as "each of the lands of this case" added to each of the above lands. 【The ground for recognition】 The fact that there is no dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), Gap evidence Nos. 6 and 7, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Part of the land which constitutes a reservoir generally in determination of the cause of the claim is in possession of the owner and manager of the reservoir.

The possession is the order of possession in the acquisition by prescription (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 95Da2074, Jul. 28, 1995).