1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On January 1, 2000, an elderly farmland improvement association was merged into the Korea Agricultural and Rural Infrastructure Corporation. Since then, on December 29, 2005, the name of the Korea Agricultural and Rural Infrastructure Corporation was changed to the Korea Agricultural and Rural Community Corporation. On December 29, 2008, the name of the Plaintiff was changed to the name of the Plaintiff.

B. On June 14, 194, the elderly group started to construct a reservoir for the purpose of supplying agricultural water to the land located in the Seoul Special Metropolitan City of the elderly group, the elderly group started to do so on December 31, 1945, and occupied and managed it. On November 6, 1989, pursuant to Article 103 (1) of the former Agricultural Community Modernization Promotion Act (Act No. 4118), the elderly farmland improvement association transferred the above D reservoir to the elderly farmland improvement association, which is the Plaintiff’s telegraph, pursuant to Article 103 (1) of the former Agricultural Community Modernization Promotion Act (Act No. 4118), and the elderly farmland improvement association acquired the above facilities and comprehensively transferred the rights and obligations arising from the above facilities and the land, and thereafter the plaintiff occupies and manages

C. The land in question was owned by E. However, F acquired ownership on October 1993 under the former Act on Special Measures for the Registration of Real Estate (Act No. 4502) due to the sale on March 20, 194, and the Defendant acquired it on April 25, 2005 due to the inheritance by consultation division, and completed the registration of ownership transfer under Article 11689 on July 18, 2005 by acquiring it on July 18, 2005.

【In the absence of dispute over the grounds for recognition, Gap evidence 1 through 6, evidence 10, each entry of evidence No. 10, evidence No. 7, evidence No. 8, evidence No. 11, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff's assertion 1 of the parties concerned comprehensively succeeds to the rights and obligations of the land of this case, which is the land of this case, from the elderly farmland improvement association, and has occupied the land of this case in a peaceful manner for not less than 20 years until now. The defendant constitutes a case where there is no change in the title holder due to inheritance from F due to a division of consultation.