logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2013. 10. 17. 선고 2013두12942 판결
(심리불속행) 원고가 유류 공급자의 기재가 사실과 다른 세금계산서를 교부 받음에 있어 선의 ・ 무과실을 인정할 수 없음[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court 2012Nu27031 (Law No. 2013.06.07)

Case Number of the previous trial

early 201J 2502 (03.27 March 2012)

Title

(C) The Plaintiff may not be deemed to have acted in good faith and without fault in obtaining a false tax invoice from the Plaintiff.

Summary

(C) The Plaintiff’s good faith and negligence cannot be acknowledged in light of the following: (a) the Plaintiff’s entry of the oil supplier constitutes a false tax invoice; (b) the Plaintiff did not request or receive the shipment slips; (c) the Plaintiff was omitted with the temperature, weight, density, etc. of oil on the shipment slips partially stored by the Plaintiff; and (d) it was possible to compare the Plaintiff with the normal company.

Related statutes

Article 17 of the Value-Added Tax Act

Cases

2013Du12942 Revocation of Disposition of Imposition of Value-Added Tax

Plaintiff-Appellant

KimA

Defendant-Appellee

The Director of Incheon Tax Office

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 2012Nu27031 Decided June 7, 2013

Imposition of Judgment

October 17, 2013

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

The records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined. However, the grounds of appeal by the appellant are not included in the grounds prescribed in each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal, and the appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of

arrow