logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원순천지원 2015.08.27 2014가단15303
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiff is a company running a golf course business, and the defendant is a company running a healthy place of business and a business manufacturing wire ropes.

B. On October 10, 2012, the Plaintiff entered into a golf course supply contract with the Defendant (a size: 12V 165AH, model number: BM12165, hereinafter “instant ship”) and was supplied by the Defendant with 30 parts of cart on October 19, 2012, 30 parts of cart on October 22, 2012, and 30 parts of cart on November 1, 2012.

C. Since then, the Plaintiff raised an issue to the Defendant, such as the Defendant that the instant fleet stopped in the wind 18 holes or significantly lowered the speed on the road, on the wind that was installed before a golf course was opened. The Defendant: (a) electric power analysis on March 4, 2013; (b) electric power analysis on April 10, 2013; (c) electric power analysis on May 7, 2013; (d) 20 cart regular inspections on May 22, 2013; (b) 15 cart regular inspections and connection lines on June 18, 2013; (c) 22 cart regular inspections on November 12, 2013; and (d) 13 cart regular inspections and connections on November 18, 2013; (d) 14th regular inspections on December 21, 2013; and (e) 24th regular inspections on December 13, 2013 and 14th regular inspections on December 14, 2014.

On April 16, 2014, the Plaintiff entered into a supply contract with Non-Party 1, a supply contract of KRW 68,400,000 with respect to the 3.6 million of TRojan Ship, and replaced a golf cart with Trojan ship from the ship of this case.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 to 14, Eul evidence 1 to 8, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff asserted that the Defendant was liable to compensate for the damages caused by the replacement of all the distribution units on the wind to supply defective distribution units. As such, the Plaintiff sought payment of KRW 68,40,000, which is the cost of replacing the distribution units, as a part of its claim.

B. The above facts are based on the facts.

arrow