logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2015.06.12 2014구합21875
난민불인정결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Details of the disposition

On February 14, 2006, the Plaintiff, a foreigner of the nationality of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan (hereinafter referred to as "Pakic Republic of Pakistan"), has entered the Republic of Korea for the first time on December 17, 2008, and has re-entry into the status of non-professional employment (E-9, and one year of sojourn) on February 23, 2009, and applied for refugee status to the Defendant on April 20, 2012, after the expiration of the period of stay ( February 22, 2012).

On December 30, 2013, the Defendant issued a non-recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) to the Plaintiff on the ground that there was no “probably-founded fear of persecution” (see Article 2 subparag. 3 of the Immigration Control Act (amended by Act No. 11298, Feb. 10, 2012); Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees; Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees).

The Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on January 14, 2014, but was dismissed on September 30, 2014.

【In the absence of dispute, the Plaintiff’s assertion as to the legitimacy of the disposition of this case as to Gap’s evidence Nos. 1, 2, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, and Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2, and the purport of the entire pleadings as to the validity of the disposition of this case was about twenty (20) years. The Plaintiff’s punishment was punjb’s regional clerk of the "PPP" ("PPP"), and the Plaintiff’s name was the representative of the PPP. From 2000 when a high school student supported PPP, the Plaintiff was assigned to C, a student organization under the PPP affiliated with the PP, and reported two meetings each month, and reported the issue of PPPP-PP-N (hereinafter “PP-N)’s activities, including PPP-N (hereinafter “PP-N).

However, since around 2008, the PMF-N party members threatened the plaintiff's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's PPP activity' to the plaintiff's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's '

arrow