logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2015.12.11 2015구단13980
난민불인정결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea on September 17, 2013 with a short-term visit (C-3) status as a foreigner of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan (hereinafter “Pakic Republic”), and applied for refugee status to the Defendant on October 16, 2013.

B. On August 26, 2014, the Defendant rendered a disposition of non-recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that the Plaintiff’s assertion does not constitute a case of “a well-founded fear that would be prejudicial to persecution” as a requirement of refugee under Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees and Article 1 of the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees.

C. On September 16, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on September 16, 2014, but the said objection was dismissed on July 1, 2015.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. On August 15, 2008, the Plaintiff’s assertion joined as a member of the Pakistan National Party (PP) (hereinafter “PP”) and served as a secretary general of the region B.

Party members of the Islamic L-N ("PML-N") of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan ("Pakist Musist Muss L-N" hereinafter referred to as the "PML-N") in competition with the PP have called the Plaintiff or it was difficult to walk the Plaintiff on the road.

On July 5, 2013, 4 of the members of the PML-N showed time to look at the Plaintiff's PP office and that they would no longer work for PP. The Plaintiff and the Plaintiff's friendship were trying to get out of the office while engaging in a conflict with PML-N. One of the parties of the PML-N was the Plaintiff's own car, and the Plaintiff's friendship suffered minor injuries suitable for the free wave of the vehicle.

The Plaintiff reported the instant case to the police, but the police concluded that the Plaintiff was erroneous.

Therefore, the Plaintiff.

arrow