1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Details of the disposition

On September 6, 2005, the Plaintiff, a foreigner of the nationality of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan (hereinafter referred to as the “Pakic Republic”), who first entered and stayed in the Republic of Korea in the capacity of industrial training (D-3) and applied for refugee status on October 14, 201, three days before the expiration of the relevant period of stay.

The defendant, on October 1, 2013, promulgated with sufficient grounds for persecution (the Immigration Control Act (amended by Act No. 11298, Feb. 10, 2012; hereinafter the same shall apply)

) On the ground that Article 2 Subparag. 3 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees, Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees, and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees cannot be deemed to exist (hereinafter “instant disposition”), a disposition for non-recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

The Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on October 15, 2013, but was dismissed on April 11, 2014.

【Fact- without any dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, Eul evidence Nos. 1, and Eul evidence Nos. 1, the purport of the entire pleadings, and whether the disposition of this case is legitimate, the plaintiff asserted that the disposition of this case was legitimate, and therefore the plaintiff supported the Pakistann People's Party (PPP). Thus, the plaintiff supported the Islamic Union-N of Pakistan (Pkistististist Muslim Lesm Value Naz hereinafter referred to as "PM-N"), despite intimidation, around 2008, 450 U.S. Election of the "MPA" (hereinafter referred to as "PL-N").

The PML-N side, which became aware of this fact, sent a intimidation message to the Plaintiff’s punishment. On March 201, 201, when the Plaintiff visited Pakistan, the Plaintiff threatened the Plaintiff with a gun before the Plaintiff’s house.

As such, even though there is a risk of persecutioning the Plaintiff’s return to Pakistan on the grounds of political opinion, the Defendant did not recognize the Plaintiff as a refugee, and the instant disposition is unlawful.

It shall be as shown in the attached Form of the relevant statutes.

PL-N was the colon of Pakistan as at October 199 at the time the military unit directed by B (hereinafter referred to as “B”) caused codification in Pakistan around October 199.

B as above.