A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Of the facts charged of this case, the prosecution against assault is dismissed.

Punishment of the crime

On March 31, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment with labor for a violation of the Narcotics Control Act at the Incheon District Court on March 31, 2016 and completed the execution of the sentence on December 28, 2016.

1. On March 16, 2017, the Defendant damaged the property due to the following reasons: (a) the victim P who driven a BM car on the road in front of the “O convenience store” located in the Gwanak-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City N on the road; (b) the Defendant: (c) moved the said car from the Defendant’s driver; (d) made the said car from the said car; and (e) made the said car on the ground that the said car was driven by the Defendant; and (e) made the car, the said car knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knif

2. Whether the Defendant, a police official, who was detained by the Defendant, was arrested as a current offender on March 16, 2017 under Paragraph 1 of Article 09:10 of the Act and Article 16 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Violence, and transferred to Qu Office in Seoul, the Police Station Qu Office in M et al., and was heard by many civil petitioners including R, is not aware of the nature of S news, Chos, and Choop impe;

내가 뭘 했는데 여기 왔냐,

C. Governance fluence should be formed through a visual glusium, and flusium, such as p.m., flusium, were publicly insultingd by flusium.

3. Interference with performing public duties;

A. At around 09:40 on March 16, 2017, the Defendant spited the Defendant’s face, spiting, following the Defendant’s demand from the police officer T who arranged the documents by stating that “S dog, Chewing franch, and franch fluor,” and spited into T’s face.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers working in police stations.

B. On March 16, 2017, at around 13:00 on March 16, 2017, the Defendant: (a) received from the police officer T with an urban area where the Defendant was occupied; and (b) “Is this remote waste drinking.”

“Along with an urban community,” she was frightened by T and Police Officers who were working in the above office.

Accordingly, the defendant is working in the police station.