Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around November 29, 2017, the Defendant obstructed the performance of official duties, on the road located in Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, “D” (hereinafter “D”) and on the road (hereinafter “Vfightingfighting”) 112, the Defendant assaulted F, a police officer affiliated with the Seoul Mandong Police Station E District, who called the Defendant to have the Defendant returned to the site, on the ground that the F, who was a police officer belonging to the Seoul Mandong Police Station Ear, Seoul, would have to have the Defendant returned to the site. The Defendant expressed that the Defendant “Is Ha, Korea, Ga, Ga, Ga, Do, Do, Do, Do, Do, Do, Do, Do, Do,

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the handling of 112 reported cases.

2. In view of the date and time, place, H, I, etc. as mentioned in the preceding paragraph, the Defendant, a police officer belonging to the said district group, insultd the victim by “Is the victim J, who is a police officer belonging to the said district police officer,” “Is the victim of the said district police group,” “Is the victim by publicly fluoring the victim by using the victim’s fluor, “Is without any money, fluor, bitch, bitched, bitched, bitched, flue, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, and openly fluored with any sound.”

3. On November 29, 2017, the Defendant damaged public goods, on the road in front of Gwanak-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the Defendant arrested a flagrant offender under the same suspicion as the preceding paragraph, and then was escorted to the lower seat of the L patrol vehicle, and thereby damaged the Defendant’s repair cost by walking the protective acrylic board installed in the said patrol vehicle on several occasions, while carrying it to the knife police station.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the use of goods by public offices, thereby harming their utility.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to the F and J;

1. Written complaint by J;

1. Each statement of H and I;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged patrol vehicles;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 141(1) of the Criminal Act (a) (a point of damage to goods for public use), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (a point of obstructing the performance of official duties), Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38(1)2 of the Criminal Act, and Article 50 of the Act on the Aggravation of Concurrent Crimes.