The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the following: (a) the summary of the grounds for appeal of this case: (b) the occurrence of the instant accident; (c) frequency and frequency of the accident; and (d) the Defendant’s speech and behavior after the accident, etc., despite the fact that the Defendant intentionally committed a traffic accident or acquired the insurance money by pretending to commit a traffic accident, the lower court acquitted the Defendant

2. Summary of the facts charged and the judgment of the court below

A. A. The summary of the facts charged (1) around 07:45 on December 17, 2011, the Defendant caused an accident involving the parts of the D i 30 vehicle wheelers intentionally, which C drive on the top of the D i 30 vehicle wheelers, and despite the fact that there was no actual injury due to the risk of the accident, the Defendant demanded an insurance receipt and received treatment by pretending the injury as if he suffered the injury, and received the insurance payment. On December 20, 201 of the same year, the Defendant claimed for the insurance payment to the East Fire Co., Ltd., which is the victim, and received 500,000 won from the victim under a mutual agreement, and on February 8, 2012, the Defendant had the victim paid 103,640 won to the F Hospital medical expenses, thereby deceiving the victim, thereby acquiring property or pecuniary gains equivalent to the total amount of 603,640 won.

(2) On July 20, 2012, around 20:50 on July 20, 2012, the Defendant: (a) caused an accident that intentionally fluorizes the fluor's fluor's fluor's fluor's fluor's fluor's fluor's fluor's fluor's fluor's fluor's fluor's fluor's fluor's fluor's fluor's fluor's car

7. Around 24.24. Around the 27th day of the same month when the victim was remitted KRW 1,300,000 from the victim for a agreed deposit, and by allowing the victim to pay KRW 173,900 to the M Hospital medical expenses, then deceiving the victim and acquiring property or proprietary benefits equivalent to KRW 1,473,90.