(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.04.29 2015고단1045

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.04.29 2015고단1045

상해등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 14, 2015, at around 00:05, the injured Defendant tried to leave the son of the victim D (the age of 49) under the influence of alcohol in front of the front corridor of the c apartment dong head, the victim “as soon as time had been late,” while taking a bath, sent the victim’s face to the corridor by drinking, booming head kn the victim’s face from the corridor, leading the victim from the corridor, leading the victim from the corridor, leading the victim to the victim for about two weeks of treatment.

2. From around 01:05 to 01:50 on the same day, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s convenience store business by force by force, such as: (a) from the first floor G convenience store of the F building in Seongbuk-si to the victim H, who is an employee; (b) but (c) the Defendant was refused to sell the knickter; (d) the knife the floor by using the items on the knife, which were displayed on the knife, as the hand, and cutting down those items on the other show knife into the floor.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to H and D;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injury), Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstruction of business) and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. Of concurrent offenders, the Defendant’s reasons for sentencing Article 37 (former part), Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act (amended by Act No. 1010, Mar. 29, 200) was able to agree with the victim D of interference with business.

However, the Defendant was sentenced to suspended sentence on August 28, 2013 at this full bench for the crime of interference with business, and on December 18, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to suspended sentence for 4 months of imprisonment for the crime of injury, etc., but was sentenced to suspended sentence for 2 years of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of injury, etc., and was inflicted an injury

In light of this, the defendant seems to have weak intent to lead a normal social life.

Furthermore, the degree of and damage to the assault of this case.

참조조문

유사 판례

-수원지방법원 2019.08.13 2019고단2123

-전주지방법원군산지원 2020.08.07 2020고단220

-수원지방법원 2016.07.20 2016고단3068

-수원지방법원 2018.11.06 2018고단2743

-수원지방법원 2015.02.05 2014고정1275