logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전고등법원 2018.07.12 2018누10789
부정당업자제재처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except for a dismissal or addition as stated in paragraph (2). Thus, this is acceptable as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(The grounds alleged by the plaintiff in this Court while filing an appeal are not significantly different from the contents alleged by the plaintiff in the first instance court, and even if all evidence submitted to the court in the first instance is examined, the fact-finding and the determination of the first instance court are justified). 2.

A. Part 1) Part 7 of Part 8 of Part 7 of the judgment of the court of first instance, "Article 22.2" in Part 7 of Part 8 of Part 7 of the judgment of the court of first instance, is isolated to "Article 22-2" 2) Part 7 of Part 8 of the judgment of the court of first instance (unfair business operator).

1) The plaintiff's claim shall be dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal shall be dismissed as it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices. 2) The plaintiff's appeal shall be dismissed as it is decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

arrow