logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전고등법원 2018.06.14 2017누13859
건축공사 재착수계 신청서 반려통지처분취소
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except for a dismissal or addition as stated in paragraph (2). Thus, this is acceptable as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(2) The court below's findings of fact and determination of the first instance court are justified even if all evidence submitted to the court of first instance are examined, although the grounds alleged by the defendant in this court are not significantly different from the facts alleged by the defendant in the first instance court, and all evidence submitted to the court of first instance are examined).

A. 1) Part 5 of the judgment of the court of first instance, the "inspection investigation" in Part 18 of the judgment of the court of first instance, as the "inspection protocol", shall be deemed as the "inspection protocol" 2) last 6th 1st 6th 7th 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 1st 1st 1st 1st 2nd 2nd 2nd 1st 201

In addition, 1) 6th 6th 18th 6th 6th 18th 6th 6th 1th 6th 6th 1th 6th 6th 6th 18th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th “the change of circumstances or significant public interest needs arise in relation to the legitimacy of the order to suspend the construction of this case shall be determined based on the circumstances known by the Defendant at the time of the order to suspend the construction of this case, and even in the circumstances that occurred before the order to suspend the construction of this case, it shall not be considered in the above judgment.”

arrow