1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except for a dismissal or addition as stated in paragraph (2). Thus, this is acceptable as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(The grounds alleged by the plaintiff in this Court while filing an appeal are not significantly different from the contents alleged by the plaintiff in the first instance court, and even if all evidence submitted to the court of first instance and this court are examined, the fact-finding and the determination of the first instance court are justified). 2. The part which was cited or added to the second instance

A. 1) Part 3 of the judgment of the court of first instance 1) Part 3, Section 14 of the judgment of the court of first instance 2, "B" in Section 5 of the judgment of the court of first instance 2, "B" in Section 7 of the judgment of the court of first instance.

In addition, 1) the part 5th 6th 6th 5th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 201, “the summary order of KRW 500,000 (201st 8711) was made with respect to the Plaintiff’s act of assault and obstruction of business operation)” (the summary order of KRW 500,000 on January 26, 2017) was made with respect to the Plaintiff’s act of violence and obstruction of business operation, and it was decided that the Plaintiff’s claim should be dismissed as it is justifiable as the judgment of the first 1st eth 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 3th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th.