logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2020.03.03 2020고단30
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

When seized Samsung Tallon, S9(No. 1) and one copy of the misrepresentation document of the KUE staff.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, along with the members of the Bosing Organization, who belong to the names in the name of POS conversation name “G” and “H”, committed acts to refer to the victim to have a low interest rate loan by misrepresenting the employees of financial institutions by misrepresenting himself/herself, or to deliver money to employees because he/she was involved in fraud by misrepresenting the employees of the prosecutor’s office and the Financial Supervisory Service. The Defendant, after receiving the money from the victim, deposited the money into the account without a passbook, and conspired in order to take charge of the so-called collection and delivery of the said money.

1. On November 26, 2019, a person who was named in the cause of fraud, who was named in the form of fraud, stated that the facts were false to the victim J by telephone, “a loan will be made at low interest. It is possible to grant a loan only if the existing loan is to be repaid,” regardless of the absence of the intent or ability to provide the loan, rather than I employee.”

At around 16:50 on December 2, 2019, the Defendant: (a) received KRW 5 million from the victim to the L bank account (M) in the name of K Co., Ltd. designated by the non-member of the name at that time; (b) from the victim, the Defendant received KRW 9,975,00 from the victims totaling 14 times until December 13, 2019, and remitted it to the designated account by the non-member of the non-member of the name.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with the employees of impishing operations, acquired a total of 9,750,00 won from the victims.

2. On or around December 12, 2019, a person who was named in the cause of an organization attempted to commit fraud stated that the fact was not a N Bank employee, but a victimO made a false statement that “it is possible to lend an existing N Bank Card loan to him/her by telephone, even though he/she did not have an intent or ability to do so.”

The Defendant, from the victim, at around 10:30 on December 17, 201.

arrow