logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 서산지원 2015.09.03 2014고단1121
사기
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year and six months.

However, as to the Defendants for two years from the date of the final judgment of this case, the Defendants are above.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2014 Highest 1121] Defendant A is a person who has been engaged in the business of screening and selling aggregate from the E mine located in the E mine located outside two lots of land from the 2008, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, and Defendant B is a person who has been engaged in the business of the development of the said mine along with Defendant A since 201.

The Defendants established a limited liability company I in order to carry out business operations, such as the establishment of mining concessions in the above mine after having invested funds from F, G, and H around September 5, 2012, and Defendant B was registered as the representative director, and Defendant A was not registered as an executive in a bad credit standing position.

On September 2012, the Defendants were seeking to purchase the said apartment in order to resolve the new bank mortgage liability, which is set forth in the Seocho-gu Seoul High School No. 103 Dong 805, 2012, as the Defendants failed to conduct business due to the difficulties in raising funds for the necessary rental fee for equipment, such as clers, equipment, equipment related to the establishment of mining concessions, expenses for authorization and permission related to the establishment of mining concessions, expenses for issuing guaranty insurance policy, etc.

When the Defendants came to know of the above circumstances of the victim through M, which was the land M around September 2012, the Defendants collected money from the victim as a collateral, by moving the ownership of an apartment within a short period of time after the mine development project was normally undertaken, and thereby raising money from the victim’s apartment as if he could pay the purchase-price.

Accordingly, the defendants met the victim at the above E mine site in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun around that time, and the defendant made a false statement that "the defendant can be paid on the day when the purchase price of the apartment is promised, since the mine location is high and the supply of stone is high and the demand for the mother and child is sufficient. Therefore, since the building stones is supplied, it is high business prospect. 3-4 months after that time, it is normal after that time, and it can be paid on the day when the purchase price of the apartment is promised." On October 17 of the same year.

arrow