Defendants are not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the Defendants is publicly announced.

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. On January 4, 2013, the Defendants conspired to commit the crime, and around January 4, 2013, at the office of the Dong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City E Apartment Women Association, there are ten female members F, etc., and even if the victim G did not embezzled the public funds of the Women’s Association, the Defendant “one is lost.” The Defendant “I will not have collected any money, I will not pay any money, and will have paid any money,” and the Defendant B “I would have put G money into the bank,” and the Defendant C “I would have damaged the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts by inserting sound.”

B. On February 19, 2013, the Defendants conspired to commit the crime, and around 19:00 on February 19, 2013, the facts within the above E apartment elderly group were not found to have embezzled public funds of the victim G, but Defendant B, Defendant B, “G bank is open, and 200 to 3 million won was clearly known,” and Defendant A, in line with the end of Defendant B, destroyed the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts by stating that “I will see the G bank, and 200 to 3 million won.” Since the internal funeral has been carried out for a total period of time, I would not bring about. I would have made it clear.” Defendant A also damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out that “I would have covered it.”

2. The prosecutor must prove that the fact was revealed in the case prosecuted for the crime of defamation by publicly alleging false facts under Article 307(2) of the Criminal Act, and that the alleged facts were not consistent with the objective truth, and that the Defendants knew that the alleged facts were false, and that the alleged facts were false. In such a case, the prosecutor must prove that the alleged facts were false. The determination of whether the alleged facts were false.