logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2014.01.17 2013고합140
특정경제범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(사기)등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for four years and for three years, respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Justice] On October 15, 2007, Defendant A was released on July 30, 2010, and the remaining term of imprisonment was expired on August 16, 2010 while he was sentenced to imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Jeonju District Court on July 15, 2007.

【Criminal Facts】

1. The Defendants’ violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud) committed a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud) were limited to importers in the event of importing light oil on August 2010, and there are many taxes such as additional taxes. As such, the Defendants pretended that they were importing beer (in the absence of any restriction on importers and customs duties, there is no restriction on the import) and sell light oil in Korea after being closely imported, and had the intention to pay profits by remaining equipment. However, the Defendants were in need of the place of storing light oil without any funds to import light oil and the place of storing light oil, and there is a concern for tax authorities to control if light oil is imported in large quantities without an additives factory. Therefore, the Defendants were in need

Accordingly, on September 2, 2010, the Defendants met the Victim G at the “F Real Estate Office located in Yeonsu-gu Incheon Metropolitan City,” and Defendant A met the victim G, and the victim “B will operate an agency for the export, import and manufacturing of oil. However, the Defendants obtained a shortage of funds from an office and prepared the early transit value” and Defendant B conspired with the horses of Defendant A, and “the most valuable profit-making..” However, the Defendants only intended to use the oil for the above smuggling business even if they received money from the victim without any intent or ability to import and manufacture the oil, or receive money from the victim.

As above, the Defendants conspired to induce the victim and let the victim pay 3 million won to H as the contract deposit for the office lease of the office, thereby making the victim pay the same amount of property profit.

arrow