1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance as to this case is as stated in the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, in addition to the application of the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Thus, this is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The second 10 parallels " May 4, 2010" shall be applied to " May 4, 201".

B. On February 26, 2014, Nonparty Company paid only KRW 70,000,000 out of the instant promissory note to the Plaintiff on February 26, 2014, and did not pay the remainder of KRW 100,000,000 to the Plaintiff.” The Defendant, who was the representative director of Nonparty Company at the time of issuance of the instant promissory note, remitted KRW 70,00,000 to the savings account in the Plaintiff’s name through the deposit account in the name of the Defendant on February 26, 2014. However, Nonparty Company did not pay KRW 10,00,000 out of the instant promissory note to the Plaintiff.”

C. The 4th 10 p.m. “1 cent” in the 4th 10 p.m. shall be added to “1%”.

The first 10,11 of the 4th 10, the " alone with the above-mentioned facts and each of the above evidences" shall be construed as "the facts recognized in the above-mentioned facts and the above evidences, and each of the above evidences, Gap's 12 through 14, the head of the new bank business support center of this court, and the result of the submission of each order to submit financial transaction information to the Korea Bank Business Center."

2. Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case shall be dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.