1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The quoted trial of the first instance court was closely examined the allegations of the parties concerned and the evidence submitted in the first instance court and the first instance court, but it does not seem that there was any error in fact-finding and judgment of the first instance court.

Therefore, the reason for the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the part of the judgment of the court of first instance is used as follows. Therefore, it is accepted by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The second written judgment of the first instance court "from April 4, 2014 to June 29, 2017" in the second written judgment of the first instance court shall be "from June 2017 to August 4, 2017."

The second written judgment of the court of first instance shall be in accordance with the “net E” of the 19th written judgment.

Part 4 of the first instance court's decision "No. 1 and No. 2" was written with "No. 6, No. 1 and No. 2, and the result of the inquiry into the Seocho Police Station by the court of first instance".

The "1.6% (0.95∑)" in the 5th sentence of the first instance judgment shall be adjusted to "1.6% (0.9∑)".

The "victim F" and "victim F" in the 6th sentence of the first instance court's 4th sentence and the 9 and 10th sentence shall be applied to "victim D."

The 7th written judgment of the first instance court shall be in accordance with the following subparagraphs.

In the vicinity of the instant accident place, ten traffic accidents have occurred from 2010 to 2018. Among them, “accidents that deviate from the road” occurred as of October 8, 2010, “an accident where vehicles depart from the right side of the road due to rain weather, shocking the pole on the right side of the road,” and “an accident where a vehicle proceeding with a bend road with a view to the fishery surging surface from the surgical surgical surging surface of the road,” which occurred on October 15, 2012. However, there was no evidence to deem that the said two accidents occurred due to the defect in the construction and management of the road in this case claimed by the Plaintiff.

“”

2. The conclusion of the first instance judgment is justifiable, and the Plaintiff’s appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.