logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.12.01 2016누46719
유족급여및장의비부지급처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, and such reasoning is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the dismissal or addition of some contents, and thus, it shall be quoted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 42

The second part of the parts written or added is as follows: “(C) The Plaintiff filed a petition for review to the Defendant, but was dismissed on May 13, 2015, and was dismissed on October 16, 2015, while the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Reexamination Committee filed a petition for reexamination to the Defendant.”

“17” in Part 2 of Part 13 shall be added to “27,28.”

The third party's "private person of the deceased" shall be added to "private person, etc. of the deceased".

The fourth and second parallels of the first and second parallels “I shall not be known,” respectively, shall be taken into account “I shall not be known, and the autopsy against the deceased shall not be made.”

2. The decision of the first instance court is justifiable, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow