logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.11.13 2016가합539118
약정금
Text

1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) paid KRW 842,566 to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and its related amount from July 23, 2016 to November 13, 2018.

Reasons

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff as a party may establish and operate a medical institution with a trade name called “D Jeong-type hospital” located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “Plaintiff hospital”) and transferred the Plaintiff’s hospital to Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E around June 2016.

The defendant is a doctor who had been a doctor, and on January 16, 2014, the defendant was a person who received the 4 and 5 climatic surgery from the plaintiff at the plaintiff hospital on January 16, 2014.

B. Around January 15, 2014, the Defendant complained of her pain pain, etc., and applied to the Plaintiff hospital. The Plaintiff confirmed that there was a serious compromise with the Defendant’s 4 and 5 crypology, and decided to implement a new crypology for the crypology of symptoms. 2) On January 16, 2014, the Plaintiff conducted an crypology with the Defendant around 10:20, and conducted an crypology therapy (hereinafter “instant treatment”).

3) After the instant procedure, the Defendant observed the progress of hospitalization at the Plaintiff hospital. On January 17, 2014, the Plaintiff conducted X-ray and MRI tests on the Defendant, and confirmed that there is no particular error on the part of the instant medical procedure. 4) The Plaintiff removed the cathercium inserted after the instant medical procedure, and then caused the Defendant to have the cathercium seen the catium. On the other hand, the Defendant complained of symptoms that could not cather the cathercium and the cathercium. On the other hand, when the Defendant complained of the catherchercium, the Defendant observed the progress of the catherchercium training by cutting the catherchercium in a way that the cat

5. On January 24, 2014, while observing the Defendant’s progress, the Plaintiff re-exploited the urinology of the urinology, but the Defendant still complained of symptoms that are not well-known to urinology.

Accordingly, on January 25, 2014, the Plaintiff is in the urology of the Gangnam Synam Hospital, a superior hospital.

arrow