logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.03.30 2016가단524193
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 16,220,560 as well as annual 5% from July 23, 2015 to March 30, 2018 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On September 4, 2014, the Plaintiff: (a) was diagnosed as having been diagnosed as having been diagnosed as having been using the escape card of the 4-5 drilling at the hospital located in Osan-si; (b) had been provided medical treatment since that time; and (c) had been provided multiple times of chronic blockings; (d) he/she received a variety of neutic surgery, neutic surgery, drugs, and physical therapy.

B. On July 11, 2015, the Plaintiff was treated as a member of the Dental Medical Center operated by the Defendant (hereinafter “Defendant Han-gu Medical Center”) and was treated as a victim of the said medical treatment.

C. Since July 14, 2015, the Defendant: (a) from around July 14, 2015, performed a procedure using slot machines, a type of medical vibration, on both sides; (b) from around July 20, 2015, performed a detailed correction procedure, including the taking-off local business, etc.

(hereinafter collectively referred to as “instant procedure”). D.

The Plaintiff received the above procedure from the Defendant Han-won to July 22, 2015, but there was a pain on the part of the Plaintiff, which did not keep to the right, and was transferred to C Hospital on July 23, 2015 by the 119 Emergency Squads around 09:50 on July 23, 2015.

E. On July 23, 2015, it was confirmed that the Plaintiff’s escape from the upcoming 4-5th century was discovered as a result of the examination of self-propiced video of the Johovah (MRI; hereinafter “MRI”), and on the same day, the Plaintiff received the removal of protruding signboards from C Hospital.

F. As a result of the Plaintiff’s inspection on September 4, 2014 and March 6, 2015, which was the transfer of the instant procedure, the Plaintiff’s 4-5 conjectioned out to the rear center and the left-hand side, and there was an opinion that the Plaintiff’s 5 conjection into the rear center and the left-hand side. As a result, on July 23, 2015 after the instant procedure, the Plaintiff’s 4-5 conjection signboards came out to the center and the rear side of both sides, the Plaintiff’s 5 conjection was moved to the middle part of the 5 conjection, and it was moved to the lower part of the 5 conjection body due to the lower part of the 5 conjection body.

arrow