Text
1. The Defendants are 8,806,235 won to each Plaintiff, and 5% per annum from June 11, 2014 to July 21, 2017.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The pertinent Plaintiff of the parties is a person who undergoes climatic surgery by Defendant C, a doctor belonging to the Defendant D Hospital operated by Defendant B (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”).
B. (1) On May 12, 2014, the Plaintiff complained of pain and pain. Defendant C, who is a doctor in charge, confirmed the Plaintiff’s opinion of compromise fire extinguishing at the intervals of No. 4-5 square meters on the simple radiation inspection, and had the Plaintiff undergo MRI inspection on the same day. Defendant C confirmed, as a result of the MRI inspection of the Plaintiff on the same day, the symptoms of the escape of the protruding signboards on the left-hand side of No. 4-5 square meters, and the need for its pressure, and recommended the Plaintiff to undergo the surgery, despite the need for continuous medical treatment and physical therapy during that period, if the symptoms continue to exist, it is necessary to undergo the surgery by explaining that the surgery is in need of medical treatment.
C. (1) On May 13, 2015, Defendant C, at the Defendant Hospital, provided the Plaintiff with the 4-5th left-hand confection surgery and the post-exploitation surgery on the left-hand side. (2) Defendant C, on June 11, 2014, and June 18, 2014, implemented the necessary flusium blocking for the left-hand side due to the Plaintiff’s flusium and flusium.
1) On June 11, 2014, the Plaintiff 201, after the Defendant C’s left-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-on-hand-hand-hand-hand-on-hand-on-hand-on-hand-on-her-hand-hand-on-her-hand-on-her-hand-on-her-hand-on-her-hand-on-her-hand-on-her-hand-on-her-hand-on-her-hand-on-her-hand-on-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-
3. On June 21, 2014, the Plaintiff established the Defendant Hospital and presented the result of the above part CT test to Defendant C. As a result of the above part CT test, Defendant C confirmed the blood species around the left-hand side of the Plaintiff.