beta
Text
Defendant
A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4 million, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.
The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Defendant A
A. On August 18, 2012, around 07:00, the Defendant interfered with the operation of the victim’s emblem by force by leaving G, an employee of the apartment management office, open a corrected door to the structure managed by the victim, thereby blocking all of the sun-type cold air conditioners in the above volatilen center.
B. At around 21:00 on December 24, 2012, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s business operation by force by interfering with the movement of its members who caused a disturbance, such as raising time fees, etc., at the same place, the Defendant’s members H, who were engaged in a campaign at the time, called “to be well-known to a low-income citizen, who is not a low-income resident,” and thereby obstructing the victim’s business operation.
C. On January 1, 2013, around 21:00, the Defendant obstructed the operation of the Victim’s Fitice Center by force by blocking water supply at the above place and by blocking water supply.
2. Defendants
A. The Defendants conspired to urge and notify several times at the same place as above from August 24, 2012 to October 10 of the same year the Defendants failed to pay 14,945,000 won for electricity and water supply from August 24, 2012 to demand payment, but there has not been no payment promise up to now, and if electricity and water supply fees for November generated thereafter are anticipated to be borne by the co-electric power rates of the resident, the Defendants will take a fractional measure, but if they do not pay from necks to December 31, 2012.
The notice was affixed with the content "...."
However, from August 2012 to October 10 of the same year, the victim paid KRW 4,200,000 for the electricity and water supply fee of KRW 14,945,00 for the portion on which the Defendant asserted that he did not demand the past, although there was a dispute with the victim by the charges unilaterally calculated by the Defendant, it spreads false facts as the victim did not delay.