Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment for four months.

However, from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, Defendant.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A On December 17, 2014, the Seoul Western District Court sentenced two years of suspension of execution to eight months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Seoul Western District Court, which became final and conclusive on December 25, 2014.

1. On April 2013, Defendant A entered into a lease agreement with Hyundai Capital (Penes) and FNAS car, and Defendant A offered the above NAS car as security at the street, a borrower, at the entrance and exit of the 107 Gyeong-si Horse Park, as it was around June 2014, at the end of the 107 Gyeong-si Horse Park, and around June 2014, Defendant A offered 870,000 won to G.

Since then, Defendant A paid the debt and got back the above NAS vehicle, but the above NAS vehicle was already exported.

Defendant

A, upon the failure to return the above vehicle from the above G, had Defendant B, an employee of (State) H, report the theft of the vehicle to the police, and had the insurance company reported the occurrence of the accident upon obtaining the confirmation of the fact of the accident from the insurance company.

Defendant

On September 4, 2014, at around 11:09, Defendant B received A’s request, called the loan box of the Ansan-gu Police Station, parked on the I side road of the members of Ansan-si, and reported the vehicle theft by falsity, and made a false report, Defendant B signed and sealed a written statement on the above false damage, and submitted it to the police officer.

Therefore, the Defendants had police officers know that they are false theft reports prepare an occurrence report, and had them enter the vehicle computer system into theft false information about the NAS car, thereby allowing them to collect stolen vehicles across the country.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to interfere with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in criminal investigation by fraudulent means.

2. The Defendant A filed a false vehicle theft report as described in the foregoing paragraph (1) and thereafter filed a false vehicle theft report.