logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2013. 06. 19. 선고 2012누38178 판결
증여재산가액을 구성하는 주식가치 증가분에 대한 근거가 없어 위법함[국패]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul Administrative Court 201Guhap4532 ( November 15, 2012)

Case Number of the previous trial

National Tax Service Review and Transfer 2010-0322 ( October 25, 2011)

Title

there is no ground for increase in stock value constituting the donated property, and it is unlawful.

Summary

(1) The profit equivalent to the increase in stock value is not subject to the gift tax, but it is unlawful in calculating the value of the gift tax by deeming that the ownership shares or the value thereof under the Inheritance Tax and Gift Tax Act fall under the case of change in the value of the gift tax.

Cases

2012Nu38178 Revocation of Disposition of Imposition of Gift Tax

Plaintiff, Appellant

GangwonAA et al.

Defendant, appellant and appellant

Head of Central Tax Office

Judgment of the first instance court

Seoul Administrative Court Decision 201Guhap4532 decided November 15, 2012

Conclusion of Pleadings

May 8, 2013

Imposition of Judgment

June 19, 2013

Text

1. All appeals by the defendant against the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1. Purport of claim

The Defendant’s imposition of gift tax of KRW 000 on February 10, 201 to Plaintiff Gangwon-A and the imposition of KRW 000 on Plaintiff Gangwon-B shall be revoked.

2. Purport of appeal

The judgment of the first instance is revoked. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

Reasons

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

This court's reasoning is the same as the reasoning in the judgment of the court of first instance except for the following parts among the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, and this is cited in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

【Additional Part】

Article 2(3) of the Inheritance Tax and Gift Tax Act provides that “The calculation of the value of the gift tax by applying Article 42(1)3 of the Inheritance Tax and Gift Tax Act (6th 14th 14th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 14 6th 6th 6th 6th 14 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 100 6th 1st 3th 6th 200,” and does not directly provide for the calculation method of the value of the gift tax acquired through the donation. This seems to be due to the impossibility of the legislation of the Inheritance Tax and Gift Tax Act’s total taxation method of the gift tax under Article 2(3) of the former Inheritance Tax and Gift Tax Act’s Article 3 of the Inheritance Tax and Gift Tax Act’s Article 3 of the Inheritance Tax Act’s Article 3 of the Inheritance Tax and Gift Tax Act’s Article 43 of the Inheritance Tax and Gift Tax Act’s Article.

2. Conclusion

If so, the defendant's appeal against the plaintiffs is without merit, all of them are dismissed.

arrow