logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2015.02.11 2014고단4377
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is a person who is engaged in driving a vehicle of salary class C.

On August 13, 2014, the Defendant driven the above cargo without obtaining a driver's license on August 11, 2014, and driven the two-lanes of the national highway No. 43, letter 43, which is located in the Macheon-do mobile bridge, from the side of the government to 70km each hour.

In such cases, a driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by safely driving the motor vehicle, such as taking the front door and left door well, operating the steering and steering system accurately.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while neglecting this, found the E-car driven by the victim D (the age of 56) who was driven by the Defendant’s negligence while driving the car at the front of the Defendant’s vehicle and operated it late, but did not avoid it, and received the part behind the victim’s vehicle as the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by occupational negligence, suffered injury to the victim D, such as salt, tensions, etc. in need of medical treatment for about two weeks, injury to the victim F (the 54-year old-age-old-age-old-age-old-age-old-age-old-age-old-age-old-old-old-old-old-old-in-age-old-in-fact-in-fact-in-fact-in-fact-in-fact-in-fact-in-fact-in-fact-in-fact-in-fact-

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed driving) driving of the franchison freight without obtaining a driver’s license in an indivous distance from the franchison probation office at the time of the government’s temporary border as set forth in Paragraph 1 to the places set forth in Paragraph 1.

3. They shall not operate any automobile on a road which is not covered by the mandatory insurance in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act;

Nevertheless, the defendant does not have mandatory insurance at the time and place mentioned in paragraph (1).

arrow