beta
Text
1. The defendant against the plaintiff A, B, C, D, and E respectively, KRW 1,00,00 for each of them, and the plaintiff F and G respectively, KRW 500,000 for each of them.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The Plaintiffs are residing in the household located in the 1 and 2Ra of Gangnam-si I apartment 103 (hereinafter “instant apartment”).
Specifically, Plaintiff A, Plaintiff B, Plaintiff C, Plaintiff C, Plaintiff D, 501, Plaintiff E, 502, Plaintiff F, Plaintiff F, 701, and Plaintiff G are possessing and residing in 1102.
B. The Defendant, along with his wife J (K) resided in the instant apartment No. 401, and the Plaintiffs and their families, since April 2016, when the Defendant and the J resided in the instant apartment No. 401, they continuously raised a question to the Defendant and the Defendant’s wife due to sound, which took place in the Defendant’s home from April 2016 to the Defendant and the Defendant’s wife, and the police officer reported to the police and visited the No. 401.
401호에서 발생하는 소음은 이 사건 아파트 옆 동으로 베란다를 마주하고 있는 102동 및 103동 로비에서도 쾅쾅 찍는 듯한 소리가 들릴 정도였다.
C. The J, in the instant apartment site, intended to take a bath to the out of the instant apartment site in a large amount of sound when the noise that she sleeps, or sleeps a bicycle, and intended to throw down waste out of the benda and spread water. D.
The J responded to the members of the household who set noise in the instant apartment No. 501 of the instant apartment No. 501, which caused noise by opening and closing the door by setting up against the lusium and the large lusium, and the police officers called up with the police officers in the instant apartment No. 501 of the instant apartment No. 501 of the instant apartment No. 11 of the instant case also talked with others, without hearing other people’s horses.
E. On November 7, 2016, the Plaintiffs and their families filed a civil petition at Gangnam-si, requesting that the employees of the Gangseo-si Mental Health Improvement Center, employees of the Ldong Office, the council of occupants’ representatives, and the head of the apartment management office visit the defendant’s office to take appropriate measures. Employees of the Dong office and the employees of the Dong office on November 16, 201.