Defendant

A Imprisonment for three years, Defendant B’s imprisonment for two years, Defendant C and D for one year and six months, respectively.

Punishment of the crime

1. The defendant A, B, C, or D shall not receive subsidies by false application or by other unlawful means;

Defendant

A is the representative director of M Co., Ltd., which is a fishery products producer in Sacheon-si L, the director of the above Co., Ltd., the defendant D, and the actual operator of the construction business E Co., Ltd. in the same city.

In accordance with the O support program promotion plan for Scheon-si, the Defendants knew that subsidies up to 60% of the total expenses (30% of the national expenses, 10% of the Do expenses, and 20% of the Si expenses) were granted to the construction of a fishery product processing factory, and, around December 201, at the same time, at the same time, A newly constructed a M factory with the total expenses of KRW 700 million from Sacheon-si, Sacheon-si with the total expenses of KRW 700 million, the Defendants did not have the ability to bear self-responsibility but applied for subsidies to cover the total expenses of KRW 1.1 billion with the subsidy of KRW 1.1 billion with the subsidy of KRW 100 million, and B, as above, C, received the subsidy granted with the total expenses of KRW 100 million, thereby soliciting the construction in sequential order.

Defendant

A, D, and B: (a) around March 15, 2012, calculated the estimate of the construction of M factory at the office of the above E-stock company at KRW 712,216,00,000, the total scale of construction was KRW 1,105,000; and (b) around that time, Defendant A applied for a subsidy of KRW 600,000,000 based on the aforementioned false contract from the Sacheon View-si, Sacheon-si, Sacheon-si, Sacheon-si, and deposited KRW 15,00,000,000 around April 25, 2012, and KRW 444,00,000,000,000 around May 18, 2012, KRW 13,000,000,0000,000 from the account under the name of the E-1,300,012.

However, in fact, around May 2, 2012 to May 3, 2012, Defendant A received from Defendant C a refund of KRW 110 million from Defendant C via P and Q’s account, etc. from April 1, 2012 to August 21, 2012, Defendant A’s share of KRW 415 million out of the above shares.