logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 강릉지원 2012.08.23 2012고단58
사기
Text

Defendants are not guilty. The summary of this judgment is publicly announced.

Reasons

Defendant A, under the trade name of Gangnam-si G, engaged in fishing (land seeds and seedlings production), wholesale retail (fishery products), manufacturing business (a consulting, etc. for the installation of fish farming facilities), and fish farming facilities (a fish farming equipment). Defendant B registered the above type of business with the trade name of the Gangwon-si H University I due to the friendship of Defendant A, and registered the above type of business with the trade name of the Gangwon-si H University I, and Defendant C was in charge of the distribution of fishery products such as fishery products, fishery resources, etc. and the support business of fish farming facilities under the supervision of Gangwon-si maritime fishery and fishery resources from July 21, 2009, and Defendant C was in charge of the distribution business of fishery products such as fish certificates, fishery resources, etc. and the support business of fish farming facilities.

In order to promote the cultivation of fish through the development of white bridges, which are new-type variety by using circular leisure facilities, and to expand the competitiveness, Gangwon-si implements the land circulation and aquaculture business by providing fishermen with facilities when producing white bridges.

1. Defendant A and Defendant B’s joint criminal defendants were selected as a business operator of the support project for the Gangnam-si G Office in July 2009, which was promoted by Gangnam-si in the middle of July 2009, and the project application including a business plan and a certificate of deposit of self-payment, etc. around August 25, 2009, and if any balance exists in the subsidies paid, they shall be returned to Gangnam-si. However, Defendant B, the actual contractor, as the contractor, excessive appropriation of the construction cost to the construction cost in the amount of KRW 249,449,00,00, and Defendant A, knowing that the construction cost was excessive, submitted to the public official in charge of Gangnam-si in the knowledge of all the fact that the construction cost was excessive, and submitted a construction cost of KRW 15 million,000,000,000,000 to the public official in charge of Gangnam-si, and applied for the completion of the project (the total project cost of KRW 75,000,00,216.2.2.25 billion.

arrow