logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.09.27 2016나2002596
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited the same reasoning as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for any modification or addition as follows. Thus, it is acceptable to accept it as it is by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

2. The amended or added part of the judgment of the court of first instance is 315,00,000 won (including additional tax) in the first instance judgment, 320,500,000 won (including additional tax).

Once the first instance judgment is dismissed, the following shall be added to the fourth 20th :

“The Plaintiff, as an executive officer of the Round, was actively involved in the conclusion of the instant contract. Defendant C et al. asserted that Defendant Space C et al. unfairly set the construction price in excess by aiding and abetting the lending of a construction business license to S and receiving a growing construction, thereby resulting in the failure of the instant construction project. However, the Plaintiff’s assertion is insufficient to acknowledge each of the above allegations by the Plaintiff, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this otherwise.”

3. Accordingly, this part of the claim in this case, among the claims in this case, is dismissed as it is without merit for the plaintiff's claim for damages on the grounds of deception of construction cost, neglect of construction supervision, etc., and the part of the judgment of the court of first instance relating to this is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition by the plaintiff's appeal.

arrow