logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.09.06 2015나2076217
운영권확인 등
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited the same reasoning as that of the Defendants in the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the parts modified or added as follows, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. On May 29, 2015, Defendant B filed a complaint with the Plaintiff on charges of interference with duties, embezzlement, etc. as follows: (a) Defendant B was convicted of interference with duties, embezzlement, etc. on April 29, 2016 (Evidence 7 through 10, 17) and the Plaintiff filed a complaint with the Defendant B for interference with duties and suspicion of occupational embezzlement; (b) Defendant B received a disposition of “influence of suspicion” (Evidence 5, 15, 2015, 2015, 2015, 205, 200, 2000, 2000, 2000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000).

"No. 16" of the 7th judgment of the first instance shall be added to "No. 20" following the 13th judgment.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow