logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.12.13 2015나2034800
부당이득금반환
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited the same reasoning as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for any modification or addition as follows. Thus, it is acceptable to accept it as it is by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

2. On the 4th page 23th page 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance, the amended or added portion “Defendant (Appointed Party) and the Appointor listed in the separate sheet” are “Defendant R, Z, AA, AB, and AC.” On the 6th page 12th instance judgment, the following is added. On the other hand, the Seoul Eastern District Court Decision 2007Gadan53557, which is the related litigation of this case, “The Plaintiff filed a lawsuit related to the sales contract concluded with U U as a director of the Plaintiff, which was the representative of the Plaintiff at the time of the Plaintiff, and thus, C, who was the representative of the Plaintiff, responded to the Plaintiff as the representative of the Plaintiff.”

On December 12, 2014, the above court rendered a judgment dismissing the plaintiff's request for retrial. However, the plaintiff appealed against this request. On October 28, 2015, the above court accepted the plaintiff's request for retrial and rendered a judgment dismissing U's claim (Seoul Eastern District Court 2015Na283).

【The evidence Nos. 1 through 18, 3 through 6 of the judgment of the court of first instance is "Evidence No. 1 through 18, 23 through 27, 3 through 6, and 13 through 15 of the evidence No. 6 of the judgment of the court of first instance," and "the defendant and the defendant (appointed party)" of the judgment of first instance No. 7 of the judgment of the court of first instance are "the revocation of the lawsuit in the above lawsuit in the above lawsuit in the retrial," and "the defendant and the defendant (appointed party)" of No. 9 of the judgment of first instance are "the defendant" as "the defendant."

In the first instance judgment No. 10, “In light of the legal principles,” set forth in the first instance judgment No. 18, the following shall be added to “each description and evidence No. 10 through 14, 22, 25 through 29.”

3. Conclusion, the plaintiff.

arrow