Cases
2012No697 Confinement, Bodily Injury
Defendant
A person shall be appointed.
Appellant
Prosecutor
Prosecutor
Kim Yong-I (Lawsuits) and Man-Im (Trial)
Defense Counsel
Law Firm Won, Attorney Shin Jae-ju
Judgment of the lower court
Ulsan District Court Decision 2012Ma517 Decided October 18, 2012
Imposition of Judgment
February 8, 2013
Text
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
Reasons
1. Summary of the grounds for appeal;
In light of the overall circumstances of this case, the sentence (a fine of KRW 5 million) imposed by the court below on the defendant is too unhutiled and unfair.
2. Determination
In light of the facts that the crime of confinement in this case is not somewhat weak, and there are unfavorable circumstances such as the Defendant’s failure to obtain a license from the victim, but the Defendant appears to result in the crime of confinement in this case for the treatment of the victim, who is the spouse suffering from neology, etc., there are some extenuating circumstances in terms of the circumstances of the crime; there is no history of punishment for the Defendant for the same kind of crime; there is no history of suspension of qualification or more punishment for the Defendant; mediation has been completed by the Defendant and the victim against divorce during a lawsuit for divorce; and other all kinds of sentencing conditions, including the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the prosecutor’s assertion is without merit.
3. Conclusion
Therefore, the prosecutor's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.
Judges
Justices Kim Dong-young
Judges Kim Sung-sik
Judges Epicked Syle and unable to sign and seal
Site of separate sheet
The presiding judge