logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.05.11 2016가단5114630
소유권이전등기말소청구
Text

1. With respect to each of the 1/22 shares of Seocho-gu Seoul N-gu Seoul 50 square meters, to Nonparty O (P) :

A. Defendants B, D, E, and F respectively.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a project financial investment company (PFV) established to promote the U Urban Development Project for the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government T (hereinafter “instant project”). Defendant B, C, D, E, and F are part of the registered titleholders with respect to each of the 1/22 shares of the Seocho-gu Seoul N-gu 50 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”) located in the instant project site, and the rest of Defendant G, H, I, J, K,K, L, and M are part of the registered titleholders with respect to each of the 1/23 shares of Q34 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”) located in the instant project site.

B. (1) On March 28, 2006, the V Urban Development Project Promotion Committee entered into an agreement on the instant project (hereinafter “instant agreement”) with W (hereinafter “W”), Korea Investment Securities Co., Ltd., and Korea Bank (hereinafter “instant agreement”). The main contents are as indicated in [Attachment 1].

(2) On April 11, 2006, W, X Co., Ltd. andY Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Co., Ltd.”) agreed to implement the instant project by the PFV method. On the same day, the Plaintiff was established on the same day. According to the instant agreement, WW’s contractual status and rights and duties, which were in the position of the executing agent, were comprehensively transferred to the Plaintiff.

(3) After July 12, 2006, the Plaintiff entrusted the execution agency service contract concerning the instant project (hereinafter “instant agency contract”) with the V Urban Development Project Promotion Committee (hereinafter “instant agency contract”) on July 12, 2006 between W 42%, X and Y respectively, 25.5%, 5% of our investment securities, and Z 2% of Z. 3) The Plaintiff entrusted the development project site, etc. to NAM in Gangnam-Nam, Inc., Ltd. (hereinafter “MM in Korea”) and the Plaintiff entrusted it to NAM in Korea.

arrow