logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원의성지원 2015.09.23 2015가단429
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendants: (a) each Plaintiff KRW 1,00,000, and 5% per annum from January 30, 2002 to September 23, 2015.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The Defendants, upon receiving an application for the issuance of credit cards from an unqualified person, omitted the entry of Defendant KFF Bank Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant KFF Bank”).

The Defendant Samsung Card was established on January 28, 2002; January 30, 2002; and on April 1, 2013, 2013, the part of the credit card business of our bank was divided and established.

The defendant's card is "the defendant's card" without distinction below.

(2) On December 26, 2001, the Plaintiff issued a credit card under each Plaintiff’s name to a person with no name. 2) Meanwhile, from October 9, 2001 to June 28, 2002, the Plaintiff was in the place of a medical treatment and custody office and was unable to file an application for issuance at the time of the above application. At the time of entering a medical treatment and custody office, the Plaintiff kept his resident registration certificate in the place of the office, and the person with no name was issued a credit card from the Defendants by obtaining the identity confirmation using the above resident registration certificate.

3) On February 11, 2003, Defendant K non-National Bank used the credit card issued by the Defendants (Defendant KNF Bank KRW 4,00,000, Defendant Samsung Card KRW 3,000, and Defendant Samsung Card KRW 2,483,327), and Defendant KNF Bank did not pay the Plaintiff’s credit card use price. 4) Accordingly, Defendant KNF Bank transferred the Plaintiff’s credit card use price claim to Defendant LG investment securities (the mission of this case’s investment securities), which are the Plaintiff’s obligor, to Defendant LLF Co., Ltd. on October 25, 2006, Defendant LLF Co., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd., on 206. 3 June 201, 201, Defendant Samsung FFC transferred its credit card use price to Defendant 3, which is the Defendant’s obligor, and Defendant 23,203.

arrow