logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 충주지원 2017.06.28 2017고단386
절도
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment of six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of two thousand won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 30, 2013, around 22:30, Defendant A, at the site of a construction project located in the Dogri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-si, the victim E, was stolen by carrying approximately 56,000,000, 1,400 won of the market value he was the victim’s possession.

In addition, from August 30, 2013 to April 21, 2017, the Defendant stolen property worth KRW 40,589,000, total market value of the victims’ possession, by the same method over 20 times, as shown in the attached Table 1 sheet of crime committed from around August 30, 2013.

2. Defendant B is a person engaged in the water trading business under the trade name of “G” from F in the city of Gyeonggi-do.

Around June 16, 2014, the Defendant purchased approximately 100 speak pipes, the ownership of the victim H, who he stolen from the above G, from the victim H.

In such cases, a person engaged in the business of selling or selling solid goods has a duty of care to verify detailed personal information, including A's address and contact address, and to enter them in a book, and to verify whether the person has a duty of care to verify whether the person is stolen by properly examining the details of acquisition of the goods subject to sale, motive for sale, and the price suitable

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while neglecting such duty of care and neglecting the judgment on the stolen water, purchased the aforementioned non-water pipe in large amounts of KRW 617,00,00, from September 2013 to April 25, 2017, and acquired it as stolen property due to occupational negligence by purchasing the 16,209,50 won in total, which he stolen from the above A in the same way via the same 23 occasions, such as the part of the attached crime inundation 2, 2013 to April 25, 2017.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made to I and H;

1. Each written statement of J, K, L, E, M, N, P, Q, R, and S;

1. Reports on internal investigation, guidance at the place where each occurrence occurred, each on-site photograph, and each CCTV extractor;

1. Protocols of seizure and photographs of seized articles;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to copies of books;

arrow