logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2016.04.29 2016고단630
야간건조물침입절도등
Text

[Defendant A] Defendant A is punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months.

[Defendant B and C] Defendant B’s fine of KRW 700,00,000, Defendant C.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. A around 01:00 on February 24, 2016, Defendant A intruded the above building beyond the back fence of the building, and removed 12 free window 3.6 million won in total at the market price of the victim F, installed on the two and three floors and the third floors, and subsequently stolen it, Defendant A invaded the victim’s residence or structure 15 times in total from January 21, 2016 to March 1, 2016, and stolen the victim’s property.

2. Defendant B is a person who is engaged in the duty of selling solid goods with the trade name of H from Seongdong-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si.

On February 26, 2016, at around 07:00, the Defendant purchased the amount equivalent to 40 km of the glass window, which was the victim I possessed by A, that he stolen from A on the above secondhand property.

In such cases, the defendant, who is engaged in the business of selling solid goods, has a duty of care to verify whether he/she is stolen by ascertaining the personal information of A, etc. on the other hand, and whether he/she is stolen or not.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to pay the above attention and neglected to determine the stolen water, thereby purchasing KRW 32,00 of the price of KRW 40km of the above glass, and acquiring stolens by occupational negligence over a total of ten times from January 31, 2016 to February 26, 2016, as shown in attached Table 2.

3. Defendant C is a person who is engaged in the duty of selling and selling solid goods with the trade name of K at the Sinnam-siJ in Sungnam-si.

On January 30, 2016, at around 07:30, the Defendant purchased the amount equivalent to 4km (new shares) from the victim L, which he stolen from A from the above top of the water surface.

In such cases, the defendant, who is engaged in the business of selling high-water, has a duty of care to verify whether he/she is stolen by checking the personal information, etc. A, while checking the acquisition process and motive of water supply.

Nevertheless, it is not possible.

arrow