1. The Defendant: (a) on February 28, 2012, the Plaintiff’s KRW 12,000,000 for each of the said KRW 12,00,000 for Plaintiff A and each of the said KRW to Plaintiff B and C.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The relationship between the parties 1) the network E (hereinafter “the network”).

) The Defendant’s hospital is the Central Veterans Hospital in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 61-ro 53 (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”).

A) Around March 2012, the Plaintiff was the deceased’s spouse, and the Plaintiff B and C were the deceased’s children, as the Plaintiff was the deceased’s children, after receiving the diagnosis of the waste cancer (T2aN1M1b) from the F Hospital and receiving the pulmonary cancer treatment, and died on September 28, 2012.

3) Meanwhile, the Defendant’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Hospital

(B) The Defendant Hospital’s medical examination prior to March 16, 2006 was diagnosed as “child-care species” after visiting the Defendant Hospital on May 30, 2006; and on August 14, 2006, after undergoing a chest computer photographing examination on two occasions, the deceased was diagnosed as “child-care species”.

After that, the Deceased was provided with respiratory and treatment at the defendant hospital at the end of 3 to 6 months, and was inspected with a chest computer at the end of one year.

2) On February 27, 2010, the Deceased was inspected on a chest computer screen at the Defendant Hospital, and the Defendant Hospital requested the Defendant Hospital to read it. On March 4, 2010, the Defendant Intervenor Hospital’s doctor H respondeded to the effect that there is no change in the number of closures on both sides, including approximately 8 meters of the deceased’s pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary mar, compared to the past inspection, and that the number of sponsings on both sides of the deceased’s pulmonary mar mar, and the upper mar mar and upper mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar, which was measured at approximately 1.4cm in the right side mpar mp, and that there was no big change in comparison with the transfer. On March 4, 2010, the Defendant Hospital’s doctor affiliated with the Defendant Hospital was diagnosed with the Defendant Hospital’s chest 2010.