Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
No credit card merchant shall lend his name to another credit card merchant.
On January 15, 2014, the Defendant opened a general restaurant with the trade name “D” at the Ulsan-gu building C, Ulsan-gu, and opened a business registration and a credit card merchant, and purchased three credit card terminals in the name of the above restaurant.
The Defendant lent one of the instant credit card terminals to G operating an entertainment tavern of “F” in Ulsan-gu E on the same day. If the said G presents a credit card to enable customers to calculate the drinking value, the Defendant, using the said credit card terminal, made the sales slip in the name of 28,597,000 won over 124 occasions on February 2, 2014, 40,887,000 won over 180 times on March 2014, 200, 27,000 won over 168 times on May 2014, and 170 times on June 23, 2014, from around 23,300,000 won on a total of 854 credit card merchants including 6,30,000,000 won on July 23, 2014, and made the sales slip in the name of G from around 168,504 to around 184,2015.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. A letter of on-site verification of credit card merchants;
1. Color;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (Attachment of monthly sales accounts on credit cards);
1. Article 70 (3) 6 of the Specialized Credit Finance Business Act and Article 19 (4) 4 of the Specialized Credit Finance Business Act concerning facts constituting an offense; the choice of imprisonment;
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that there is no record of punishment exceeding a fine, the fact that G has paid the tax imposed in connection with this case, and the fact that the error has been pened, etc.);