Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
No one shall make a transaction by credit cards in the name of another credit card merchant while making a transaction by credit cards.
On January 15, 2014, the Defendant: (a) leased one credit card terminal in the name of a general restaurant from G that opens a business operator and a credit card merchant at the building located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu to a general restaurant; and (b) provided credit card customers with a credit card to calculate the drinking value on 124 occasions over 28,597,00,000; (c) around March 180, 2014; (d) around 27,00,000,000, around 168 times on May 168, 2014; and (d) drafted a credit card store with a total of KRW 268,78,00,000,000 on 170,000,000 on 170,008,005, 204, 2016, 306,784,201, 2014.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Copy of the suspect examination protocol concerning G by the prosecution;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on site photographs, such as a written accusation, a front statement, and each field photograph;
1. Article 70 (2) 3 of the Specialized Credit Finance Business Act and Article 19 (4) 3 of the Specialized Credit Finance Business Act concerning facts constituting an offense;
1. The reason for sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution does not specify the sales slips and sales proceeds issued by the defendant under the name of another credit card affiliated company, and the crime period also extends over a long period of time.
However, the execution of punishment shall be suspended in consideration of the fact that the defendant has no criminal record in addition to the fine, and reflects the wrongness, and that the tax and additional tax imposed by the tax office has been paid in connection with the crime of this case.