Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,700,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

[2016 High Court 364] On September 17, 2013, the Defendant received a fine of one million won as a crime of fraud from the branch court of the Daegu District Court on September 17, 2013, more than twice the same records of the Defendant.

On May 13, 2014, at around 03:15, the Defendant issued an order for alcohol and alcohol as if the Defendant would pay the price to the victim at the “Dju” operated by the victim C in Seo-gu, Daegu Metropolitan City B.

However, in fact, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay the price due to the suspension of prosecution due to an involuntary detention, including the case from two cases.

The Defendant received 50,000 won from the victim, such as 9 Macju and 1 Macju.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

[2016 fixed-term 625] The defendant is a person who is engaged in daily work and has three times of pre-employment and has three times of experience.

On September 4, 2013, the Defendant did not have the ability or intent to pay the drinking value because he did not possess cash or credit card at the F cafeteria located in Daegu-gu, Seo-gu.

Nevertheless, the Defendant: (a) received from the victim G(A) who is the owner of the business, one of the 11-speaks and one of the speaks; and (b) requested the payment of the drinking value to the victim; and (c) did not pay 80,000 won of the drinking value.

[2016 fixed-term 633] The Defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay the price even if he was provided with food, etc. in a restaurant as an unemployed person without any special import.

Nevertheless, at around 21:00 on October 14, 2013, the Defendant ordered the victim I to pay the price to the victim at the restaurant operated by the victim I in Daegu-gu, Seo-gu, as if he would pay the price to the victim. The Defendant ordered the victim 1 to the 9 illness, 1 Sin-si, Man-si, Man-si, Man-si.

Although the Defendant was provided with the above food, etc. by the victim, the Defendant did not pay 80,000 won.

Accordingly, the defendant, by deceiving the victim, acquired economic benefits of 80,000 won.

Summary of Evidence

[Judgment of the court below]

1. The police of the defendant.