logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2020.02.11 2019고단2444
사기등
Text

As to the crimes of 2019 order398, which are decided by the defendant, the remaining crimes of 2,00,000 won are decided.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Power】 On June 21, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years in August by imprisonment without prison labor for a violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents at the Daegu District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on June 29, 2018.

The Defendant, around March 24, 2019, up to 2019, up to 2019, posted a letter to the effect that “after accessing E, which is an Internet used goods transaction site, sales of gallon gallon jusium 10,000 won,” and then sent the main text to F, who reported and contacted the fact, first remitted KRW 620,000 to E.

“The purpose of “ was to make a false statement.”

However, even if the defendant receives money from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to send the above things.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 620,00 from the victim to the SCB bank account (G) in the name of the Defendant, and by deceiving the victims two times in total from that to March 31, 2019, such as the statement in the list of crimes in the attached Table, and then transferred KRW 1,244,00 in total from the victims.

Accordingly, the defendant was provided property by deceiving the victims.

"2019 Highest 2678"

1. Crimes against victims H;

A. On January 7, 2019, the Defendant: (a) stated that “The Defendant would sell an identification card and an authorized certificate to the victim H in front of the JJ located in Daegu-gu and the front of the road; and (b) provided that “The Defendant would sell an identification card and an authorized certificate in front of the opening to the middle-gu mobile phone and sell it to the middle 650,000 won; (c) However, even if the Defendant opened a mobile phone in the name of the victim, he/she sold it to the victim and issued the proceeds thereof to the victim; (d) did not think that he/she would have a cell phone to the victim; and (e)

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim by the above method, and his identification card for the opening of the cell phone from the victim on the same day.

arrow