Seoul High Court 2006Nu31589 (Law No. 14, 2007)

Whether the appraised value of the stocks appropriated as the capital increase profit of assets is appropriate.

Even if shares were donated to the bond ledger and agreed to compensate for the difference at the time of below the appropriate price, there is no additional preservation in accordance with the preservation agreement, the objective market price of the shares at the time of donation is regarded as profit from the increase of assets.

The contents of the decision shall be the same as attached.

쇠지지 300 쇠지지지 3000 지지지지 1. AAA Bank

2. BB bank;

3.CC;

쇠지지300 쇠지지지 3000 지지지 3000 지지지지지 3000 지지지

Article 300 u u3000 u300 u3000 u u3000 Seoul High Court Decision 2006Nu31589 decided August 14, 2007

쇠은은 개은은 개은은은 3000 개은은은 3000 아은은은이 이 3000 개이 이 300 개이 30010.

44 44 44 44 44 45 44 444 64 44

All appeals are dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

쇠鹬 쇠鹬 3000 쇠鹬 3000

The grounds of appeal are examined.

According to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance as cited by the court below, the court of first instance acknowledged the facts as stated in its reasoning after compiling the adopted evidence, and determined that the disposition of imposition of shares related to the shares of this case, based on the premise that the defendant, in 2000 business year, on the premise that the financial institution of the SS Motor Vehicle Co., Ltd. including the plaintiffs on August 24, 1999, donated 3,500,000 shares issued by the SS Bio-resources to the creditor financial institution of the SS Bio-stock Co., Ltd. on June 29, 200, 222,50 shares issued by the plaintiff Co., Ltd., Ltd., and 74,786 shares issued by the plaintiff Co., Ltd., Ltd., to the plaintiffs on June 29, 200, was unlawful on the premise that the market price of the shares of this case is KRW 7,700,00 per share.

In light of the relevant statutes and legal principles and records, the above judgment of the court below is just, and there is no error of law by misapprehending legal principles as otherwise alleged in the ground of appeal

Therefore, all appeals are dismissed, and the costs of appeal are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.