The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. Although the Defendant had no record of being punished in that case, there was no significant amount of damage caused by each of the crimes in this case, there was no full recovery of damage or no smooth agreement with the victim until the trial is held. The victim’s mental suffering or incidental damage is deemed to be considerable after considerable period of time after each of the crimes in this case, and all other sentencing materials included in the records in this case, including the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, and environment, are considered appropriate and excessively unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.

(However, since the application of the judgment of the court below is clear that the "each of the choice of imprisonment" was omitted at the end of the relevant statutory column for criminal facts, it shall be corrected to add it in accordance with Article 25 of the Rules on Criminal Procedure.