The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the original court’s imprisonment (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below committed the theft of this case repeatedly by using a credit card and mobile phone device, which is the damaged product, and committed the fraud of this case or fraud by using the computer, etc., and the crime of embezzlement by possession was committed with a driver's license obtained by forging and exercising the application form for the issuance of passbook with the driver's license that acquired the stolen product, and the nature of the crime is not always good in light of the contents of the crime, and the total amount of damage is not much, and the damage has not been recovered until the trial. In full view of all the sentencing data on the records of this case including criminal records, age, character and behavior and environment of the defendant, the punishment of the court below is appropriate and excessively unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.

(However, since it is obvious that the "F" in the second and eighth criminal facts of the judgment of the court below is a clerical error in the "P", it shall be corrected in accordance with Article 25 of the Regulations on Criminal Procedure.