logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2017.04.19 2016고단3730
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동퇴거불응)등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the Defendants did not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 26, 2016, the Defendants were demanded to change business hours from the injured party around 02:50 on the same day while drinking alcohol to the “E” main points of “E,” where the injured party D working in Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Sung-gu, Sungnam-gu, Seoul.

However, without complying with this, the Defendants’ failure to comply with “I will drink remaining alcoholic beverages and will not be free from drinking money;

Nice Doz.

“Admony” and the victim did not appear to be arrested for police officers dispatched after receiving a report from the victim on the same day at around 03:50.

As a result, Defendants did not comply with the request for eviction by the victim jointly.

2. On October 26, 2016, at the place indicated in paragraph 1, around 03:50 on October 26, 2016, Defendant A received a request for the eviction from a slope belonging to the Sung-nam Police Station F District G of the Sung-nam Police Station, Sung-nam, who called to the site after receiving a report that “for customers interfere with their business,” and received a request for the eviction from Defendant A.

In this context, "Gara", "G was sealed in several hands," and "G was continuously demanded to leave;

By "Nondora", G was assaulted by her hand by pushing ahead of his chest.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 reported duties by police officers and the maintenance of public order.

3. Defendant B, at the time, at the place specified in paragraph 2, and at the place, the police officers, such as Sloping G belonging to the F District of the F District of the Sungnam Police Station, arrested A as a current offender who refused to leave and interfered with the performance of official duties, and assaulted G’s arms by hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the police officer's criminal investigation and arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each legal statement of witness G and D;

1. Notice of a department related to the report of 112 case;

1. Application of the Act on Video CDs submitted by a victimized police officer 1.

arrow