logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2017. 08. 23. 선고 2017두47854 판결
(심리불속행)사실과 다른 세금계산서[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court-2016-Nu-6108 ( October 17, 2017)

Title

(C) Other tax invoices different from the facts of hearing;

Summary

(2) The summary of the instant disposition cannot be deemed to violate the principle of taxation based on the basis of the findings of the relevant customer’s investigation.

Related statutes

Article 39 of the Value-Added Tax Act

Cases

Supreme Court Decision 2017Du47854 Decided revocation of Disposition imposing Value-Added Tax

Plaintiff

AA

Defendant

BB Director of the Tax Office

Imposition of Judgment

August 23, 2017

Text

1. All appeals are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but the allegation on the grounds of appeal by the appellant does not include or are without merit in the grounds provided for in each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the same Act, and the costs of appeal are borne by the losing

arrow