1. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the plaintiff ordering payment is revoked.

The defendant shall make 23,103 to the plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The status of the party is that the defendant operates the Dmsung (hereinafter referred to as the "Defendant Council member") in Busan Jin-gu C, and the plaintiff is a person who has undergone an autopsy, sewage correction, etc. from the defendant as follows.

B. The instant surgery and the subsequent process 1 Plaintiff on June 4, 2012 and the same month

8. He was consulted on whether it is possible to improve this through a sexual surgery when he was able to listen to a lot of stories that the Plaintiff seems to stroke from the Defendant when she was living in the Defendant Council member twice. On June 15, 2012, on the part of the Defendant Council member, he was administered with an internal sewage correction method, a pair of strokes, a snow bottom local redisposition, and a skin dystrophying method (hereinafter “instant surgery”).

2) On June 18, 2012 and on February 20, 2012, the Plaintiff removed the actual boomed rice and underwent a transitional observation by visiting the Defendant Council member on June 18, 2012, and thereafter, the Plaintiff was inside the Defendant’s Council member and was working to correct the left eye of the Defendant (hereinafter “instant primary boom surgery”).

(3) The Plaintiff was administered on July 4, 2012 and the same year.

8.6. Two times in the same month after he/she has been subject to the full-time observation by attending the defendant Council members.

9. The Defendant was under the procedure of re-correctional surgery (hereinafter “instant secondary re-operation”) by attending the Defendant Council members.

4) On August 22, 2012, the Plaintiff was subject to the Eanancy and examination, and the Plaintiff complained of symptoms showing that the left eye was frighted, and that the snow was frighting together with the symptoms of the right eye, and that the snow was frightened, and was prescribed by the Plaintiff, such as an an internal medicine relaxing or a siren for treatment. On August 29, 2012, the Plaintiff was subject to the mitigation of the degree of frightening, but the degree of frightening was somewhat mitigated, and the Plaintiff was prescribed by the Plaintiff on September 5, 2012, after removing the siren for treatment because the symptoms of frightening were frightening.5) ① on August 14, 2012.

9.7.4